



Moderator: carlson1
Well, the shoulder thing that goes up must be hidden behind the folding thing--you know, that thing that folds over the other thing--so the machine gun automatic bazooka Glock part assault thing can't be seen....jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.
This can remain a pistol, so no NFA nonsense required. The device mounted on the buffer tube is a "pistol stabilizing blade", not a butt stock. No shouldering permitted just in case an ATF secret squirrel is lurking about the public gun range on a recon missionBeiruty wrote:Your 9mm Carbine got a Fed Stamp, is this in the wings too, or did you give up on NFA ticket?
OK, you are scaring me, what was your MOS?jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.
If you want to see panic, wait until the liberal media discovers "tactical sporks"...Skiprr wrote:Well, the shoulder thing that goes up must be hidden behind the folding thing--you know, that thing that folds over the other thing--so the machine gun automatic bazooka Glock part assault thing can't be seen....jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.
11B/C but back in the day (started with OD fatigues) for an officer that was light/mechanized infantry. Went from LPC to APC.Bitter Clinger wrote:OK, you are scaring me, what was your MOS?jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.
jmorris wrote:11B/C but back in the day (started with OD fatigues) for an officer that was light/mechanized infantry. Went from LPC to APC.Bitter Clinger wrote:OK, you are scaring me, what was your MOS?jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.
Yeah, but do you need a stamp for the rocket?Bitter Clinger wrote:jmorris wrote:11B/C but back in the day (started with OD fatigues) for an officer that was light/mechanized infantry. Went from LPC to APC.Bitter Clinger wrote:OK, you are scaring me, what was your MOS?jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.![]()
![]()
LAW Adapter:
vs.
LAWS Rocket:
NFA stamp not needed for the adapter.
I never needed a stamp. Of course, I only fired the M72A2 while I was working for our uncle.The Annoyed Man wrote:Yeah, but do you need a stamp for the rocket?Bitter Clinger wrote:jmorris wrote:11B/C but back in the day (started with OD fatigues) for an officer that was light/mechanized infantry. Went from LPC to APC.Bitter Clinger wrote:OK, you are scaring me, what was your MOS?jmorris wrote:I'm missing something. I don't see any anti-tank weapon on this thing.![]()
![]()
LAW Adapter:
vs.
LAWS Rocket:
NFA stamp not needed for the adapter.
Still looking for an FFL that can handle an ITAR transferThe Annoyed Man wrote: Yeah, but do you need a stamp for the rocket?
I'm going to go ahead and ask it here. I served 77-83 and don't remember ever seeing it referred to as LAWS in the military. First time I saw it referred to as LAWS was at a police display in the late 80s. Any ex-mil here that used LAWS instead of LAW?Bitter Clinger wrote: .....
LAWS Rocket:
NFA stamp not needed for the adapter.
1973, Ft Leonard Wood, MO. Drill Sergeant SFC Austin introduced my Basic Combat Training company to the M72A2 Light Antitank Weapon (LAW). We became better acquainted over the next 5 years at Ft Hood and Ft Benning.jmorris wrote:I'm going to go ahead and ask it here. I served 77-83 and don't remember ever seeing it referred to as LAWS in the military. First time I saw it referred to as LAWS was at a police display in the late 80s. Any ex-mil here that used LAWS?Bitter Clinger wrote: .....
LAWS Rocket:
NFA stamp not needed for the adapter.