legality of black powder weapons

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: legality of black powder weapons

Post by seamusTX »

Mike1951 wrote:Jim, it does not have to meet both requirements.
There is an 'OR' in there that you're missing.
If it meets the age requirement OR if it meets the ammunition requirement.
There's the underlined part and A or B, B being that it is a replica that does not use cartridge ammunition.

Federal law is irrelevant to the state law. It will likely be state or local police who are enforcing state law.

Does anyone know about Texas case law in this area?

- Jim
User avatar
jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: legality of black powder weapons

Post by jimlongley »

KBCraig wrote:
Mike1951 wrote:Jim, it does not have to meet both requirements.

There is an 'OR' in there that you're missing.

If it meets the age requirement OR if it meets the ammunition requirement.
Exactly.

Antique firearm.
(a) Any firearm (including any firearm with a matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system) manufactured in or before 1898;

and (b) any replica of any firearm described in paragraph (a) of this definition if such replica
(1) is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed
ammunition, or
(2) uses rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the United States and which is not readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade.


The ammo restriction applies to replicas; otherwise, every Peacemaker would be a non-firearm.

Jim, your grandfather's C96 Mauser pistol is an antique. As far as BATF is concerned, it is not a firearm.
Oops, yup, well - I don't have it anyway.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
CJATE
Senior Member
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:47 pm
Location: Waco

Re: legality of black powder weapons

Post by CJATE »

Flip open the next cabalas catalog you get, he can have any black powder shooter that they can mail order to you (i.e. no FFL for shiping)

but IANAL
KBCraig
Banned
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Re: legality of black powder weapons

Post by KBCraig »

Mike1951 wrote:But my point was that a firearm manufactured prior to 1898 still qualifies even if ammunition is currently available.
Yes, I was agreeing with you. I don't currently own a pre-'99 firearm, but if I should luck into a pre-'99 MLM or Long Lee, and it headspaces correctly, I wouldn't hesitate to fire some 1986 South African Mk.VII ball through it. And if someone in another state offered me enough money, I'd gladly sell it to them, no licenses required.

If I could persuade my nephew (who lives in another state) to sell me the M1871 Beaumont-Vitali he inherited from my father, it's an interstate transfer, but since it doesn't involve a "firearm" by definition, federal law doesn't apply.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”