I think it has started

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

OverEasy
Senior Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:02 pm
Location: NW of Houston

I think it has started

Post by OverEasy »

Wed. Nov. 5 2008, I stopped by one of my favorite gun stores at 9:25 AM this morning. Usually at that time on a Wed. 2 or 3 people would be a crowd. Today a dozen or more were shoulder to shoulder and two deep at the rifle counter. Three guys were handling ARs, the ones waiting looked tense. At a pistol counter a guy asked "Do you have any AR lower receivers?" His next question was "How many ya got?" 9:25AM! The place was a little too intense for me this morning. I decided to wait till next week to look at pistols.
It could just be a coincidence, maybe.
Regards, OE
NRA
TSRA
JPFO
American Legion
USN (69-77)
What did you expect?
tboesche
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: I think it has started

Post by tboesche »

OE,
I do not think this is a coincidence. I think supplies of lowers, complete AR's &AK's, not to mention <ags and ammo are going to pretty low for the next couple months
"Water's, wet, The sky is blue. And old Satan Claws, He's out there, and he's just getting stronger." Joe Halenbeck
"So what do we do about it?" Jimmie Dix
"Be prepared, Junior, That's my motto, Be Prepared". Joe Halenbeck
User avatar
M9FAN
Senior Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:17 pm
Location: Pearland, TX

Re: I think it has started

Post by M9FAN »

Interesting...

Purchasing my EBR and stocking up on ammo 6 months ago may turn out to be one very good decision!
"Upon the conduct of each depends the fate of all." - Alexander the Great
RECIT
Senior Member
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: I think it has started

Post by RECIT »

I have been on the fence about the type and brand of EBR I wanted, but I ordered a new Ak from Lancaster Arms yesterday. The election did not have anything to do with my decision to purchase yesterday. They did say b/c of all the influx of orders it will take an extra week to make it and ship it. I'm a patient person and it will be worth the wait.
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
Dave01
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Rockwall, TX

Re: I think it has started

Post by Dave01 »

I have no doubt that there is a good deal of fear based buying going on. We all know the AWB will be reinstated. However, I suspect there is also a significant amount of opportunistic buying going on. Some of these items may well be worth 2x or more their current value once the AWB hits. I’m not certain this is a good idea though as I saw a report (on this board I think) that said Obama wanted to make the “sale or transfer” of these items illegal. I read this to include private sale or transfer, but I don’t really have the details.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26886
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: I think it has started

Post by The Annoyed Man »

My son just received a DPMS Low Pro upper (no forward assist) with a 16" bull barrel from the big brown truck of happiness this morning. He bought it so that he could switch out uppers on his RRA lower. The other upper has a 24" bull barrel with a good scope mounted. He's going to buy some flip up sights for the new upper.

As soon as I can put aside the $409.00, I'm getting one too for my Bushmaster lower.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
aardwolf
Senior Member
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:47 pm
Location: Sugarland, Texas
Contact:

Re: I think it has started

Post by aardwolf »

What I hear from people in the know is the new AWB won't grandfather anything for the little people.
We're here. With gear. Get used to it.
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: I think it has started

Post by anygunanywhere »

aardwolf wrote:What I hear from people in the know is the new AWB won't grandfather anything for the little people.
Aw c'mon, aardwolf. Where is your faith in the democrat system?
dwhitley wrote:All these acusations that keep getting posted here are just that and nothing more... dont get caught up in the bull... give the guy a chance then make your call as to good or bad... DW
Everyone deserves a chance to prove themselves.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: I think it has started

Post by Purplehood »

I just read the text of HR1022 and don't see anything in the Grandfather clause limiting it to any specific category of people.
SEC. 4. GRANDFATHER PROVISION.
Section 922(v)(2) of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, is amended--
(1) by inserting `(A)' after `(2)'; and
(2) by adding after and below the end the following:
`(B) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm the possession or transfer of which would (but for this subparagraph) be unlawful by reason of this subsection, and which is otherwise lawfully possessed on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph.'.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar
KaiserB
Banned
Posts: 647
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: DFW Texas
Contact:

Re: I think it has started

Post by KaiserB »

Purplehood wrote:I just read the text of HR1022 and don't see anything in the Grandfather clause limiting it to any specific category of people.
SEC. 4. GRANDFATHER PROVISION.
Section 922(v)(2) of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, is amended--
(1) by inserting `(A)' after `(2)'; and
(2) by adding after and below the end the following:
`(B) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm the possession or transfer of which would (but for this subparagraph) be unlawful by reason of this subsection, and which is otherwise lawfully possessed on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph.'.

Furthermore HB 1022 strikes the "manufactured after Oct 1994" clause, meaning it will be banned if manufactured after the date of enactment of HB1022. In my interpretation this means no guns will have to be turned in to the Govt. We do have Ex-Post-Facto in this country (thank you God, and the founding fathers) that prevents many retro-active laws and punishments. (ex post facto laws are prohibited in federal law by Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution and in state law by section 10)
jdm
Junior Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:10 pm

Re: I think it has started

Post by jdm »

It looks like HR 1022 will still allow transfer of grandfathered "assault rifles". You just have to go through an FFL.. IANAL, YMMV. This closes the so called "gun show loophole" Now that Obsama has taken over both the executive and legislative branches of the government, I expect them to not be satisified with just HR1022 and try to go even more restictive.

SEC. 6. REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE TRANSFER OF LAWFULLY POSSESSED SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

Section 922(v) of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(5) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer a semiautomatic assault weapon to which paragraph (1) does not apply, except through--

`(A) a licensed dealer, and for purposes of subsection (t) in the case of such a transfer, the weapon shall be considered to be transferred from the business inventory of the licensed dealer and the dealer shall be considered to be the transferor; or

`(B) a State or local law enforcement agency if the transfer is made in accordance with the procedures provided for in subsection (t) of this section and section 923(g).

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1022" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;:
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26886
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: I think it has started

Post by The Annoyed Man »

anygunanywhere wrote:
dwhitley wrote:All these acusations that keep getting posted here are just that and nothing more... dont get caught up in the bull... give the guy a chance then make your call as to good or bad... DW
Everyone deserves a chance to prove themselves.

Anygunanywhere
The problem is, he's already proved himself. When you examine his record on the 2nd Amendment, it's atrocious.

I tried to order one of those same DPMS uppers for myself like the one my son bought, and they were already sold out.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26886
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: I think it has started

Post by The Annoyed Man »

KaiserB wrote:Furthermore HB 1022 strikes the "manufactured after Oct 1994" clause, meaning it will be banned if manufactured after the date of enactment of HB1022. In my interpretation this means no guns will have to be turned in to the Govt. We do have Ex-Post-Facto in this country (thank you God, and the founding fathers) that prevents many retro-active laws and punishments. (ex post facto laws are prohibited in federal law by Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution and in state law by section 10)
I would feel better about that if I thought that Obama really believed the Constitution says what it says. He doesn't seem to believe that it does when it comes to matters concerning the 2nd - witness his opinion that Heller was wrongly decided and his ensuing statement that he believes local governments may restrict the 2nd. Neither does he believe what the 1st says - witness his campaign's several attempts to have the FEC haul John McCain into court for his insistence that Obama's long time associations with radicals and terrorists bore looking at. So I don't believe for a New York minute that Obama gives a rip about Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution, unless it can be used to justify his intention to disarm Americans. In THAT case, he'd be all about Article I, section 9 of the U.S. Constitution.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
stroo
Senior Member
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Coppell

Re: I think it has started

Post by stroo »

I bought a Saiga shotgun and a couple of CMMG lowers today from Military Gun Supply. They were busy and I overheard one of the guys say that they might as well not go to the Gun Show in Fort Worth this weekend because they wouldn't have anything to sell.
User avatar
AggieMM
Senior Member
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: I think it has started

Post by AggieMM »

Last week, I ordered a lot of 30 round AR15 mags from "bravo company". Today, I noticed that all 30 rounders were "OUT-OF-STOCK". So the run on AWB stuff has definitely begun.

Ryan
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”