I'll accept anything as fact that has a resource trail that I can confirm or my own (such as many textbooks) or comes from an eyewitness. Other than that, I'm always skeptical to a point.marksiwel wrote:Would I right a term paper based on a wiki article, no. But the Wiki articles I posted pointed to specific things I was referencing.
Unless you want me to grab History text books and scan them into the Computer and then we can read hundreds of pages together. But wait, http://blogs.newsobserver.com/campusnot ... book-wrong" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Text Books can be wrong too! Oh no!
Sky Diver Rick also said he wouldn't accept links from CNN, if you think CNN is too biased, I would also say you shouldnt accept links from Fox News, MSNBC, or AP.
So we cant take Text books or Major news Papers or Wikipedia articles., well what else have we got then? How about Self Run Websites? Oh wait, anyone could just write anything right?
So, I guess we will just have to accept badly written text books, Wikipedia articles and news organizations, and point out errors as we see them instead of sending out blanket statements saying X,Y or Z, is wrong. That is unless you havent been doing this your whole life and just been accepting everything you read as true, if so I highly suggest you sign up for the New York Times, you're the kind of Reader they are looking for![]()
Moving on...
Anyone care to prove that anything I said is false? Anyone? I'll even let you quote from Wikipedia
T.